Is there a double standard in immigration law between foreigners living in the Philippines and Filipinos living in Western countries? Do foreigners here feel they are at a disadvantage?
There are far more Filipinos living in Western countries (the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and Europe) than Westerners living in the Philippines. Many of them are OFWs, and they serve as a lifeline for the economy.
However, Filipinos living abroad gain far more rights than foreigners who live in the Philippines long-term.
Overseas Filipinos can become permanent residents and usually can obtain citizenship within 10 years.
*Foreigners have no realistic path to Philippine citizenship.*
Filipinos can eventually vote and take part in the political process.
*Foreigners cannot vote, and merely expressing a political opinion can get them deported.*
*Filipinos can own real estate and land.*
*The Philippine Constitution prohibits foreign land ownership.*
*Filipinos can start businesses.*
*Foreigners face restrictions, and the 60-40 rule applies to business ownership.*
*Filipinos can use public services such as healthcare, pensions, and unemployment benefits.*
*Foreigners do not have such access in the Philippines.*
*Filipinos have due process and the right to appeal in immigration matters.*
*Foreigners here can be deported immediately over minor violations, and the authorities have broad discretion over "undesirable aliens."*
So there are two questions.
1. From the standpoint of fairness, equality, and non-discrimination, why shouldn't we, as foreigners, receive the same rights in our own countries that Filipinos enjoy there? Why doesn't our government demand that?
Many of the posts here say that foreigners are a "privileged class" or "think they're better than others," but legally speaking, the reality is that foreigners living here have far fewer rights than Filipinos living in our countries.
2. How do foreigners feel about this? Do they feel they are losing out?